Methodology

How we review hospitality software

hospo.tech is built around operator situations, not vendor wishlists. A system that works for a three-person espresso bar might be the wrong fit for a multi-site restaurant group.

Some pages are still seed profiles. We would rather say “needs checking” than invent fake certainty, fake star ratings or fake hands-on testing.

What we evaluate

CriterionWhat we check
Venue fitCafe, restaurant, bar, pub, QSR, food truck, hotel or multi-site.
Australian relevanceLocal availability, AU pricing signals, support, hardware and payment fit.
Core workflowWhether the tool handles the messy work it claims to handle.
IntegrationsAccounting, payments, rostering, bookings, ordering, delivery, loyalty and inventory.
Commercial riskPricing clarity, contract terms, hardware lock-in, payment lock-in and cancellation pain.
Operational riskOffline mode, support hours, exports, training burden and service-time failure modes.
Evidence qualityOfficial sources, product docs, public pricing, screenshots, operator feedback and update recency.

How pages get ranked

Rankings are based on best fit for the stated use case. “Best POS for cafes” is not the same question as “best POS for a multi-site restaurant group.” We prefer clear caveats over one-size-fits-all rankings.

Affiliate and vendor relationships

Hospo.tech may earn referral or affiliate revenue from some vendors in future. That cannot buy ranking position. We will include useful tools even when there is no commercial relationship, and we may deprioritise tools with poor fit, unclear pricing, weak local support or bad operator risk.

What we will not do

Update process

Each software profile carries a last-checked date when available. Pricing, integrations and support claims change often, so older records should be treated as leads for verification, not final buying advice.